Obama, George Floyd, and the redistribution of empathy

Thomas Sowell has spoken often about the role of community organizers is mobilizing grievances. If you’ve paid any attention to the social history of the United States for the past 15 years, you may have noticed something else that’s been mobilized at exponential levels. Having a community organizer for a president at a time when social media was exploding became the perfect storm mobilizing white guilt as a political weapon. The chain of events, emerging patterns, and aftermath is getting ugly.

The Trayvon Martin case became the test pattern. Take an event, use the media propaganda machine to creatively alter and present the facts surrounding the incident, and let the viral nature of social media run its course. In the new world of social media, immediate real time feedback became available to see how well a narrative was being received. In the Trayvon Martin case, the narrative was swallowed whole by a good chunk of the American public by the time Obama threw out the “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon”. If you look at the state of racial grievance and intellectual dishonesty today and the property damage, loss of life, and manufactured stupidity left in its wake, Obama’s statement could have very well been the most destructive statement ever made by an American president.

As it turns out, part of the deception involved what Trayvon really did look like. Even though he had become a muscular, troubled teen who liked to fight, the pictures that circulated of him were of him as a young boy. The pictures of George Zimmerman (the man who shot him) that were presented by some news outlets actually went to the trouble to lighten Zimmerman’s (a man of Hispanic descent) skin.

Zimmerman was acquitted of murder charges because the evidence demanded it. But it didn’t matter. The stage had been set. The perfect model for stirring irrational levels of public outrage had been revealed. Media and social media sleuths/influencers set out on q quest to find the next “unarmed black man shot by a white cop” story.

A couple of years later Michael Brown was killed by a police officer and the “hands up, don’t shoot” hoax was born. Officer Darren Wilson was acquitted and Ferguson, Missouri erupted in chaos, violence, riots, looting, and property damage.

The following year Freddie Gray died in police custody and that became an excuse for rioting, looting, and violence in Baltimore. City leaders allowed it to happen and made silly excuses for inexcusable behavior.

And then came Covid, George Floyd, and the Summer of Love. The video footage of Floyd’s death in police custody in Minneapolis was hard to watch. And it provided, not a spark, but an explosion for what has become what is likely the longest sustained period of willful and manufactured stupidity our country has ever seen. People who still don’t see what has happened still aren’t interested in being part of the correction.

At this point I don’t even think it matters if Floyd died from a fentanyl overdose or from Derek Chauvin’s knee on his neck. But it does matter that mob rule made it impossible for Chauvin to receive a fair trial. Any jury member that believed him to be innocent would have had to live the rest of their life in hiding if they voted as such. That seems important.

But what was most important of all were the false assumptions that were dumped on the American public in the aftermath. Floyd’s treatment was emphatically because he was black, because of racism. Police bad. White people bad. America is a racist country. Any form of black underachievement shall be declared to be due to racism. And probably the most important of all-the model was firmly in place for manipulating the public into seeing events precisely as they are told to see them and to care about what they are told to care about.

There is a perfect phrase to describe what has been methodically going on through constant propaganda and manipulation…….redistribution of empathy. Formerly bible-believing churches and preachers have even veered off the course of preaching the gospel of Jesus to the gospel of “be nice and care about whatever the current thing is”, while condemning those who won’t follow the same path. The result is that a lot more people end up following a crowd that’s heading in the wrong direction because it’s framed as being empathetic. Yes, toxic empathy is real and it’s destructive.

But backing up to the time of Floyd’s death, Americans basically lost their collective minds. The death of a woman beating drug addict in police custody, instead of allowing any possible guilty parties face justice, became an acceptable reason to launch criminal behavior nationwide and launch the idea of collective guilt of a whole country that needs to be restructured from the ground up. Minneapolis suffered almost $1 billion in property damage while the mayor and the governor of Minnesota (who nearly became the next vice president) allowed it. Riots followed nationwide and leaders were too cowardly to condemn or stop them, even calling the riots “the voice of the unheard”. Remember being told that bricks and mortar can be replaced? How stupid was that?

White people ate it up. They wouldn’t dare oppose the George Floyd BLM movement. They were persuaded to see racism and discrimination where there was none. They started apologizing for wrongs they hadn’t committed. They started taking steps to prove they weren’t racist. Corporations spent billions to prove that they were on the right side of social justice history. Construction began on the massive DEI complex to combat the invisible hand of racism and combat racism with…….racism. People bought into the existence of systemic racism even though nobody could ever cite a specific system or institution that was racist. People bought up nonsense books like “How To Be an Antiracist” and “White Fragility” and the invented history of “The 1619 Project” made its way into hundreds of schools. President Biden told us that white supremacy was the biggest domestic terror threat and some of you swallowed it whole. We were told that black people can’t be racist and you bought that too (racism is a sin that any human can be tempted with).

Basically the public was bombarded with loads of nonsense and we were dared to speak against it. Most people went along. I recognized the silliness of it all but I’m still embarrassed when I go back and read things I wrote from that period and see how much I tempered my words instead of speaking boldly…….hesitant to fire up the mob against me. We let one incident define the condition of an entire country. The model lived on. We were told that combating racism was a top priority and we bought it.

One positive of it all was that it established a dividing line between those who are willing to play pretend (often to win the approval of people/culture) and those who are not.

For those who are willing to pretend, the beat has rolled on. Media and social media influencers have since provided an easy to spot ongoing pattern of “articles I want to write, facts be damned”. “Unarmed black man shot by cop” is always being scoured for. “Orange man bad” has been the steadiest one. After abortion bans began going down in some states, “woman dies after being unable to receive an abortion” became an article that many were dying to write. When Trump took office in 2025, “Person wrongfully deported’ topped the list for many jouranlists. The articles you’ll read on any of these subjects will have close to a 0% chance of being presented in a 100% factual way. But they will provide you with steady doses of opportunities for false moral and practical high ground.

Because you are constantly being told what to care about. You need to use people’s preferred pronouns. You need to call illegal aliens “undocumented immigrants. You need to call homeless people “unhoused people”. Your former definition of “love your neighbor” was twisted into wearing a mask, confessing your white guilt, supporting open borders, and believing that government social programs can solve all societal ills. You are constantly being tested. Do you follow the crowd or follow truth and reality?

Perhaps the thing that we’re being told to care about the most here in 2025 has exposed just how twisted our moral compsses have become. People who enter our country illegally, commit crimes, and know they are facing deportation can go to designated sanctuary cities that offer them an extra layer of protection from deportation. Providing incentives for criminals to come to your city seems like an obviously terrible strategy for making your city safer. But at some point, public safety stopped being the goal for many leftist leaders. It’s just another casualty of “replacing what works with what sounds good” (Sowell). And it may just be that cowardly actions in the face of evil is itself evil.

But every time you get drug into a “Maryland father of four wrongfully deported” or “Arizona grandmother who’s been here since 1999 deported” story, remember that you won’t be honestly told if Maryland man came here illegally, beats his wife, or engages in gang activity. Presenting facts is not the intent of the news story. The intent is to get you to look where you’re told to look and care about what you’re told to care about. Hey, who’s still got their Ukraine flag up?

But here’s what has obviously happened as more and more people have been dragged onto this path of being led around by emotions and manufactured guilt. The ability to recognize, confront, and restrain evil is quickly dying. If you look across the landscape of what happens daily in our country and in the world and the most evil thing you can see is Trump, your ability to recognize what’s truly evil may be deteriorating.

For every “Maryland Man” there is a Maryland mother of four raped and killed, and thousands more robberies, beatings, murders, DUI fatalities, and drugs sold by people who should not be in our country or have no business being outside of prison walls.

The recent stabbing death of a young Ukrainian lady on a train highlighted a lot of these points. Black man who should have been locked up kills white woman. Racism? Maybe. Probably equal evidence that he targeted her because she was white as there ever was that George Floyd’s treatment was due to racism.

Do we need to restructure our whole country based on this one event? Well, we kind of do. We at least need to stop following the crowd in the wrong direction. We kind of need to quit being led around by our noses by intellectually dishonest and cowardly people. And we need to let this be a reminder that mercy for the guilty often becomes punishment for the innocent. This time someone paid with their life. These the true preventable crimes. When the folks of modified “love your neighbor” say “the government needs to do something”, that something never seems to include putting more criminals in prison and keeping them there for longer periods, removing criminal illegal aliens from our country, or gaining firm control of who enters our country. As I write this, people in Washington D.C. and Chicago have somehow been led to believe they should protest the presence of ICE and National Guard sent there to help reduce crime.

Loving your neighbor means protecting them from evil. This cannot be done without sometimes physically removing evil people from their presence. Good parents know this. Good leaders know this. The number of national leaders who have the backbone to take necessary steps to make the city streets of America safer from acts of evil is apparently shrinking quickly. And it’s my belief that the public has been steadily deceived in recent years in their ability to even recognize evil. If you’ve found yourself more concerned about food stamp recipients being unable to get a 12-pack of Coke than you are about systems that allow people with 50 catch and release arrests finally killing somebody, you might consider seeking out some alternative sources for information.

Stay grounded in reality. Don’t be lured into worlds of make-believe (where they talk about birthing persons and such). And don’t be fooled into failing to recognize evil. Always be on the lookout for places where evil is being renamed instead of being boldly opposed. It always needs to be restrained.

Trading Poop For Sh*t!

poop shoe

 

I owe some people an apology.  Early on in this ongoing bowel movement that has been the presidential election of 2016, I spoke freely and openly about the idiocy of Bernie Sanders and socialism in general.  At the time, I really didn’t grasp that some of my adult friends would actually be voting for Bernie in the primary.  Looking back now, I realize that my remarks probably gave the impression of calling people stupid for supporting Bernie.  For that I apologize.  My intent is almost always to be critical of thoughts and ideas without being overly critical of those who buy into them.  But I know it doesn’t always come across that way.  I apologize.

I’ve followed along pretty closely through the primaries, with hopes of a candidate with true conservative values winning the Republican nomination.  Maybe someone who possesses wisdom, integrity, honesty.  Someone who understands the dangers of an ever-expanding federal government and the exponential rise of the nanny state.  Gee, maybe even just someone who has genuine leadership skills.  Someone that will be a president even for those who didn’t vote for them.  That just didn’t materialize.

Before our eight years of Obama, I was never overly concerned with who out president was. My main concern has generally been for what Americans believe and not so much for who our supposed leader is.  But it is now my belief that no American president has ever done a more masterful job of negatively influencing the thinking of an upcoming generation and effectively silencing and shaming dissenters.

From Obama’s ongoing narratives, racial division has been re-ignited and disrespect for law enforcement has been energized.  Climate change is a new religion.  Work ethic steadily dies along with personal responsibility, as he pushes for equal results under the disguise of equal opportunity.  Affordable care act has basically made healthcare more affordable only for those who aren’t paying for it anyway.  The “everybody deserves” movement has never had so much momentum.  It’s probably safe to say that no president ever has done more to lay the groundwork for outright socialism (Obama and Hillary both love socialism, but only Bernie has the courage to call it what it is).  So yes, my attention level has risen.

So where does that leave conservatives?  Between Hillary and Trump, it may be a race between socialism and free markets.  That’s enough to make me vote for Trump, almost.  I don’t feel it’s necessary to hash out a laundry list of what I don’t like about Hillary (being conservative should explain why I could NEVER vote for Clinton).  Suffice to say that both candidates face a continuous onslaught of negative publicity, simply because that is the true path their life has taken and the malodorous trail that is left behind.  Plenty of folks have done a fine job of laying out a case for not voting for either one of them.  Yeah, I get that loud and clear.

Can I vote for Trump?  At times I thought I could, simply because of what I was voting against.  I was undecided until today.

I don’t say this to get others to follow along.  And I certainly don’t want to present my position as the right position or one that Christians should take.  But I have a feeling that many others feel the same as I do.  Unsure.

I have 10 & 16 year-old sons.  I care deeply what the United States of our future looks like. I care deeply what our younger generation believes in and where they lay their hope and their trust. My hope is that they place their trust is Jesus Christ as a savior who gives them hope, strength, and guidance.  I have a family to raise and a family business to run…..no matter who is president.  And regardless of who our nation’s leader is, I can use my life and my words to make an impact for Christ.  We don’t need a perfect environment to practice Christianity or to raise our family in God-honoring ways.  We don’t need an intrusion-free business climate to keep the doors open and keep the bills paid.

Yes it’s wise to be informed and concerned.  But I refuse to resort to hand-wringing about who our next leader is.  I refuse to buy into the perspective of “we’re doomed if _____ wins.”  Maybe for Christians, we’re not doomed, but we are seriously distracted from the life that God desires for us when we allow ourselves to become overly distraught about election results.  Again, I’m not trying to shame anyone for a level of passion that they may have reached.  I’m just telling people where I landed.

As a business man, I’m thankful that I don’t conduct business and treat people the way Trump has a history of doing.  And as women, I’m just forever grateful that my wife and daughters are polar opposites of the person that Hillary is.

But still, I could vote against Hillary and vote for Trump.

Except that I have two daughters of voting age (18 & 20).  And if they ask me who they should vote for, I could not with good conscience tell them to vote for Trump. But they didn’t even ask me.  And perhaps that is the deciding factor that speaks loudest of all.  My girls spend their time in the Bible seeking God’s direction in their life instead of following the biased hysteria of CNN, Fox News, and social media.  They are more concerned with God than they are about political and economic circumstances.  Pretty sure my wife feels the same way. I’m following their lead.

For all you folks that have done such a fine job telling the world why we shouldn’t vote for either, I commend you for a job well done.  You win.  I will vote for neither.

Like a good friend of mine has always said when left with choosing between two bad options………..

“You’re just trading poop for sh*t.”

In the end, you can choose to call your prized pile of manure something else.  But it still stinks.

Don’t bother telling me I have to choose one.  No, I don’t.

The UPS Truck Ran Over the Cat. Where’s My Gun?

gun control

Some years ago, my daughter had a Calico cat that I despised.  And I had a gun that I’d never fired.  But no, it’s not what you think.

I can’t recall the exact sequence of events on that fateful day, only that a UPS van that turned around in our rural driveway, plowed over poor Daisy.  But Daisy didn’t die.  She was left in a sad distorted mess and destined to die.  It became my job to put her out of her misery.

That brings us to my brief history of gun ownership.  Events in my life had led me to purchase a small caliber pistol for potential protection against the presence of some evil folks who lurked on the outskirts of my work life.  But I had never fired it.

My experience with guns (here in the heart of hunting and gun-loving friends) consisted of one bold shot into a pond with a .22 rifle as bored teen that sent a large frog a long distance through the air……..in a lot of pieces.

So I find and load my pistol, and drag poor Daisy to a secluded spot behind our house to bring her life to a merciful end.  The only problem was, that even though she couldn’t move, it still took me three shots to get a direct hit.

twit of the year

Apparently I turned my head, closed my eyes and flinched each time I shot.  But I finally finished the deed.  I’m pretty sure my kids still think of this story every time they see a UPS truck.

But why do people buy guns?  Why do people vehemently defend their right to own guns?  And why do politicians bring up gun control laws every time a news story of gun violence reaches national airwaves?

I couldn’t begin to get inside the mind of an avid gun owner.   But I think the main reason that people purchase their first gun later in life is simply to protect themselves against the presence of evil people in their world.  A couple of horrific news stories motivated my wife to arm herself………not against guns, but against godless evil people.

Make no mistake, it is of greatest importance to be more heavily armed that whatever potential evil we may face.  If somebody wants to assault me with bare hands, then I want a baseball bat (since I’ve never been in a fist fight in 47 years, I don’t imagine I could win one now).  If someone comes at me with a knife, I’ll be needing a gun.  If danger shows up with a gun, I’ll most likely need a bigger gun.

I won’t argue just how big of a gun is big enough.  And I won’t argue the finer points of intrusions and registrations that gun control regulations present.

But I will toss this out there:

There needs to be a shift away from freaking out about what people possess (guns), and serious consideration of changing the way people think (heart)

The problem with so many problems is that government wants to step in and overstep in cases where inaction is perfectly fine.  But politicians want to grab every horrible headline and say, “Yes, I am going to fix that for everybody.”

Hillary Clinton certainly wasn’t going to miss her chance after two TV journalists were fatally shot on the air last week.

“We have got to do something about gun violence in America. I will take it on. There are many people who face it and know it but then turn away because it’s hard,” Clinton said. “It’s a very political, difficult issue in America. But I believe we are smart enough, we are compassionate enough, to figure out how to balance the legitimate Second Amendment rights with preventive measures and control measures so that whatever motivated this murderer who eventually took his own life, we will not see more deaths, needless, senseless deaths.”

Gun control would have prevented this double murder?  Probably not.  You simply can’t ignore the condition of a man’s heart in all these discussions.

She claims that it’s a political problem (and of course, she will fix it).  But it’s not a problem of laws, regulation, and ownership.  Gun violence is a problem of moral decay.

Laws can be made to bring and maintain order in society.  But government cannot enter homes and legislate the presence of moral values and respect for life.

Instead, government officials constantly claim to fix problems that they can’t fix, but all they achieve is poisoning impressionable minds with false hope of easier and better lives by someone else’s provision.  The result is that misguided souls experience the disappearance of personal responsibility.  Dependent people become hopeless people.  Hopeless people become angry people.

Just as you can’t fight a war on poverty by passing out checks & removing incentives to work, you can’t fight a war against hatred and violence by ignoring moral issues, placing blame on objects, and cultivating false hope with empty promises.

We don’t have a gun problem.  We have a people problem….a hope problem.  Ever increasing government intrusion and chatter breeds hopelessness and helplessness.

God and self, in that order.

Big government……silence is golden.  You can’t really fix a lot of things.  People can fix things.  But the more you intrude and the more you talk, you continue to demonstrate a fine ability to make matters worse.

Daddy, How Can You Be a Christian AND a Democrat?

“Daddy, how can you be a Christian and be a Democrat?”
Honest question. Thirty days later I still don’t have the answer.
I’ve read a lot of bible verses about subjects like “work” and
“looking after orphans and widows”.
I even came across this one:
“You shall not murder.” Exodus 20:13
So now, I have arrived at this conclusion:
I don’t have THE answer. I have AN answer.
Biblical truths form my belief system.
These beliefs determine my attitudes and my actions.
But it’s been awhile since I had a chat with anyone on the supreme court about abortion.
And I’m still waiting for my opportunity to weigh in on a national level
on matters like welfare and healthcare reform.
For Christians, political parties cannot define who we are.
I assume many Christians fall into a similar category; one party consistently
supports or promotes positions that are exactly
“what is wrong with our country”.
But truthfully, picking a side in politics simply dictates how we might vote.
It doesn’t dictate how we live.
My approach to political discussions resembles the exchanges I have with
someone who has a favorite sports team that I despise.
I dislike everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Louisville Cardinals.
And I don’t know why or how anyone arrives at the point of being fans, but some fine
people and dear friends are devoted fans of these teams.
Our different views provide opportunities for colorful discussion, but
it can never affect our relationships.
If the guy sitting next to me in a pew (hypothetical yes, because I sit alone….
bad singing and all) happens to run for sheriff or mayor as a Democrat in Smalltown, USA
then I can’t really label him as a baby killer and assume that he will fight to the
death for anything and everything that the Democratic party stands for on
a national level.

boss hog

He could be a 4th generation Democrat that believes in the same biblical truths as me.

Perhaps his interpretation of taking care of widows and orphans differs slightly from my own.

It’s not, and cannot be made to be a huge issue.

What is the huge issue?

I believe it is this:  that Christians should be very careful how they
speak and interact with others when it comes to political differences.

It matters not if someone is Republican or Democrat.

It matters only if they are a believer or an unbeliever.

Christians must have an awareness of refusing to water down or compromise biblical truths.

But as we engage with others in interactions of a political nature we must also be

aware of the dangers of our actions and words ensuring

that unbelievers will remain unbelievers.

Live what you believe…….absolutely.

And know that political debate, while it can stimulate intelligent and entertaining discussion,

is not an effective ministry tool.  It is a good way to identify with those who believe as you do.

It may not be the best way to change the beliefs of those who do not.

And it may not be the best way to spend your time and energy.